If there are multiple SQL instances on the same server, the port number for each is not necessarily what you expect. I remember struggling once and forcing the new primary SQL instance to 1433 which should not be necessary. One of the SQL tools allows you to play with the port #'s... which is not recommended.
On the SQL side, for Windows firewall, I just put an incoming rule for the SQL service program (which you can get from the Services applet... a tip from
@Steve Iwanowski during a MOTM pre-conference session a few years ago. ).
------------------------------
Kevin Moyes
Technical Systems Analyst
Munjal White Consulting Co.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-12-2022 09:22
From: John Kerr
Subject: Working on an upgrade to Sage 100 2015 premium thi
Hello Alnoor
This is an old post, but now I'm upgrading this same client to Sage 2020 PU3, working with multiple IT teams, networking, firewall and SQL DBA's.
Reviewing the multiple entries here, did we conclude that the Citrix Server needs to have the SQL 1433, 1434 open?
------------------------------
John Kerr
Net at Work
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-13-2015 14:07
From: Alnoor Cassim
Subject: Working on an upgrade to Sage 100 2015 premium thi
This happened last week to us. The firewall settings looked good but getting this same error as you. Asked IT guy to disable firewall anyway then it started working. If he asks why can you even start up MAS the answer is that connection is from App Server to SQL Server, whereas with reports its directly from wkstn (Citrix server) to SQL Server.