Sage 100

 View Only
  • 1.  Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 11:52
    Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?


  • 2.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 11:53
    I haven't installed it, but IMHO, 2016 - meh, 2016C - good


  • 3.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 11:56
    I have installed it at three or four clients. No enhancements or 3rd party add on's. If you are going through the effort on a vanilla upgrade/install, go for it. BTW, I did use it to process Aatrix w2's for about six clients. Nothing unusual there either.


  • 4.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 12:03
    Other than the prompt for the new interface and it defaulting to the new interface on just one workstation and a conflict with their Webroot Antivirus it went very well. @BethBowers , how goes the buy in from clients for the c product?


  • 5.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 12:08
    @LarryBradford - have only discussed it with 2. Too swamped right now to even care...


  • 6.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 12:14
    just getting started with it. No 2016 C yet.


  • 7.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 12:47
    @LarryBradford - Still too early on the 100C push though if you need the tier credit, it could be interesting. I really don't see a LOT of traction in the existing base for this - Pay more and give up your perpetual license for pretty????


  • 8.  RE: Version 2016. Good, Bad, or Meh?

    Posted 01-18-2016 15:15
    Zero interest on 100c. Most of the demand these days is from customers where they are in the middle of changing servers or migrating servers to Amazon so they figure they should upgrade Sage 100 at the same time. Been that way for about the past year.