90p Admin

 View Only
  • 1.  This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 06:54
    This is an unacceptable response. Who would like to have a discussion with Dawn and if nobody does can I just remove her? https://90minds-com.socialcast.com/messages/8291972?ref=group


  • 2.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 06:55
    She's also one of the key ""holier than though"" players who doesn't want to allow any additional users into the group but then pulls this kind of crap. If nobody has an opinion on this she's gone.


  • 3.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 07:28
    I'll have a discussion with her.


  • 4.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 07:46
    Thank you


  • 5.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 07:49
    I think we could create a hilarious blog post out of all the examples of this stupidity from her


  • 6.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 07:56
    Wow... I don't get why she bothered to answer if all she was going to do was say ""yes"". Was she trying to be funny?


  • 7.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 08:31
    I have no idea but I question the value that such behavior brings to the group especially in light of the fact that their firm appears to have conflicts with most other potential members in their area. So we essentially sit on our hands about potentially admitting other members while we're being stroked with this BS.


  • 8.  RE: This is an unacceptable response. Who would like t

    Posted 12-22-2011 09:12
    This is typical Dawn ""crap"". People will post looking for assistance and all we get is ""yes, I've done that"" with no other offerings. Yes, we all understand you do great things, but the point of the group is to SHARE. She has even declined to do webinars on scripting. I'll post back after the ""CTJ"" discussion.