Sage 100

 View Only
  • 1.  The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 07:49
    The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as of 7-7-11. And the MAS 90/200 Integrated Solutions Compatibility Matrices have also been updated - as of 3-15-11.


  • 2.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 07:58
    Have you spotted any changes of note?


  • 3.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 08:00
    Haven't looked yet.


  • 4.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 08:06
    I see there is still no mention of SBS 2011.


  • 5.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 09:19
    Thanks for the notice.


  • 6.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-20-2011 09:41
    Still nothing showing for F9 compatibility -- even though Sage supported that for years. The ultimate FU to customers who bought it in good faith. Sage claimed they goofed when I pointed the omission out and promised to add F9 back in. And the check's in the mail too.


  • 7.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-26-2011 06:40
    @GeneUlrich, Jeff Konstanzer at Sage just posted this: Hey Brian, others, we will support Windows SBS 2011, which is built on the Windows Server 2008 R2 core... At the same time, please ensure that you thoroughly evaluate the use of these types of server Network OSs. They load, by default, as a Domain Controller, includes MS Exchange, etc. Therefore, you really need to understand the needs of the customer, their business model, and how that will play into using this same server for hosting additional network applications. Ideally, we prefer a stand alone system for our products. Posted by Jeff Konstanzer http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=62736067&gid=1644357&commentID=46491445&trk=view_disc


  • 8.  RE: The MAS 90/200 4.40 SPM's have been updated - as o

    Posted 07-26-2011 06:52
    @GeneUlrich, Jeff K just added: Also, sorry, you will see it added to the SPMs in the near future. Again, I recommend a stand alone powerful system running Windows Server 2008 standard or R2.