General Consultant Discussion

 View Only
  • 1.  The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 08:17
    The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be Ballmer's legacy.


  • 2.  RE: The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 08:37
    Yes. And his decisions will be instructive for many trying to figure what to do with large tech firms, and with their own careers. About the latter. He dropped out of my business school after winning the competitions of both premier business consulting firms'; clearly very, very smart. And yet all that brain wattage couldn't come to terms with his ego wanting to be even smarter -- in other words, Bill Gates. He needed to prove that. And yet, what in 20th-century business history shows that this has ever been possible? Gates managed to be both a founder and able to grow the business really, really well. That's rare enough. To also have anybody, much less another member of the founding team, then succeed after simply doesn't happen. There are a bunch of reason, I think, but it doesn't matter: it simply can't happen. I wouldn't be surprised if Ballmer in his twilight year doesn't admit, ""I should have left a couple years after Bill did. I could have started any number of start ups to become successful in my Second Act. Instead, I chickened out when faced with the opportunity for true change."" That's a lesson for anybody who finds him-herself facing a major change after a good run of success.


  • 3.  RE: The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 09:04
    When your stock surges after you announce you are leaving, that's got to be a kick to the ol' ego


  • 4.  RE: The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 12:40
    The dude made $800 million with that surge. I'm sure he's just fine.


  • 5.  RE: The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 13:06
    LOL, that's true... But at his worth, it isn't about the money. If it was, he could have retired 10+ years ago and never worked a day again.


  • 6.  RE: The failed Ballmer years. I predict that will be B

    Posted 08-23-2013 14:44
    here's an interesting ""It's not really Ballmer's fault"" take on it. Essentially it says that MS did about as good as a large incumbent could do. There is a lot to that. A lot. the prevailing incumbent rarely makes it from one technology to the new one (DEC comes to mind ...). Still, it speaks volumes as to Ballmer's hubris and to the non-independence of the Board to not push for something more radical (ala IBM's recovery in the '90's and HP's attempts today), recognizing that there was no way that an exec who grew up with the business was going to succeed at beating the odds into the next gen. http://wapo.st/13XhWuQ