90p Admin

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

  • 1.  Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-13-2012 22:18
    Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but my suggestion was that we make OASIS membership be firm based, so the firm has to be in good standing for the individual members to be considered members and 90 Minds membership be based on the individual and be by invitation only. So, Brett Zimmerman can be a member of 90 Minds whether Oasis stays in good standing or not and we don't have to invite Oasis into 90 Minds. Thoughts? For or against?


  • 2.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-13-2012 23:18
    I'm confused by this ... what the hell are you saying here?


  • 3.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-13-2012 23:21
    I'm saying that membership in 90 MInds should be for the individual and not the firm (IE Mike Arick isn't granted 90 Minds membership just because I'm in) but that membership in OASIS should be firm based.


  • 4.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-14-2012 02:11
    That's my memory too (about Robert's question).


  • 5.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-15-2012 07:36
    Not a lot of response?


  • 6.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-15-2012 08:00
    Just voted.


  • 7.  RE: Some of us talked about this back at the MOTM, but

    Posted 03-15-2012 08:05
    I voted.


Related Content