Sage has been pressuring a change to subscription for the past few years. Nothing new here.
I actually like the non-feature benefits of subscription which make it easier and cheaper to subscribe, cancel and swap platforms.
Too bad Sage couldn’t have started out with an honest conversation about changing license terms from perpetual to subscription.
Trying to add pizazz to their legacy product lines by bolting “cloud” into the names was a big mistake that fooled nobody except the investment community.
Maybe that’s who Sage was really looking to reach with the name change?
Unfortunately, I have an uneasy feeling that once a critical number of users are on subscription we will see continue price hikes in the form of either outright increases, change in price policy ( user tiers ) and perhaps eventually a changed from concurrent to named users.
IMO, the Sage 100, 300, 500 platforms are used as the cash engine to attempt to grow Sage’s strategic Sage Business Cloud offerings ( Intacct, X3, One ). The biggest unknown is whether these three amigos will grow fast enough to satisfy the investment community.
I struggle to see Sage becoming successful when they continue to hire ( and cycle through ) executives and managers with little ( or no ) experience working in the field.
One reason Taylor Macdonald has been so successful is that he actually worked in the positions which he is now managing.
---------------------------------
Wayne Schulz - Schulz Consulting - 860-516-8990
---------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-20-2020
From: Doug Higgs
Subject: RE: Sage unveils annual price adjustments
Most of the investment in new features applies to subscription end users. Why are perpetual customers getting a 15% increase? Trying to pressure a change to subscription or perhaps a change to another software publisher?
------------------------------
Doug Higgs
Midwest Commerce Solutions, Inc
(312) 315-0960
Assistant to the Traveling Secretary
------------------------------