Now that Atlas is ""done"" the developers from that were shifted to SageOne ... they were so good at producing a half-baked product the first time, they could apply their experience to SageOne. Looks like they succeeded.
If you analysis holds, Wayne, then it's another example of Sage not understanding when development $$ needs to higher than in other products or lifecycle phases. That deeper misunderstanding is more troublesome than anything -- it won't change.