Another benefit of RemoteApp is that you control which programs the user can run remotely. With full desktop access, it is harder to limit what the user can do, but if you only publish Sage, they cannot open other programs you don't want them running from the terminal server.
The file confusion is a big deal, for less tech-savvy users.
------------------------------
Kevin Moyes
Technical Systems Analyst
Munjal White Consulting Co.
Toronto ON
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 01-13-2026 13:00
From: George Khairallah
Subject: Sage 100 running as a Remote app - Pros and Cons
Coming from the hosting side (we ran this via AWS with self-deployed RDGateway/RDWeb/Broker and now via Azure AVD - Managed Service), there are no inherent performance "wins" strictly from running Sage as a RemoteApp versus a full desktop. The performance relies on the infrastructure; the delivery method is just about user experience.
If your users already have local desktops with their own ecosystem (Outlook, Excel, etc.), RemoteApp keeps it clean. It removes the "second desktop" confusion and just presents the app.
Two things to watch out for:
File Confusion: Since RemoteApp is transparent, users often forget they aren't actually on their local machine. You need to educate them on drive redirection or set up a clear file transfer workflow (like WebDAV or OneDrive) so they don't lose files on the server side.
TSPrint: You actually don't need RemoteApp to use TSPrint; it works perfectly on full RDP desktops too. That said, TSPrint is vastly superior to native printer redirection and I'd recommend it regardless of which deployment method you choose.
------------------------------
George Khairallah
CTO / Co-Founder | gotomyerp / Zaptiva / CFOTech
george.k@gotomyerp.com | 877-888-5525
https://gotomyerp.com
------------------------------