I wouldn't have the same concerns. VLANs are mainly used to logically separate one physical local network into many virtual segments, usually for management, grouping, traffic priority or security reasons, in which case they usually increase performance (less broadcast traffic to process or interfere). Just like physical LANs, you need a router to connect VLANs together. They're not really related to VPNs, however, you could use a VPN to connect one-or-more VLANs together across an unsecured path (like the public internet), in which the VPN would be the bottleneck and negatively impact performance. Let me know if that's clear-as-mud...
------------------------------
Steve Iwanowski, NextStep Technology Advisors, aka DSD Lancaster PA ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-25-2020 09:36
From: Brett Zimmerman
Subject: Recently upgraded customer to Sage 100 2017 Premiu
@Steve Iwanowski, @Wayne Schulz, others: Based on my understanding that VLAN is a "subcategory of VPN", is it safe to say that running Sage 100 over a VLAN is comparable to running over a VPN? - meaning that you'd have the same performance concerns.
------------------------------
Brett Zimmerman
Net at Work
Greater Boston Area
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-02-2017 07:08
From: Steve Iwanowski
Subject: Recently upgraded customer to Sage 100 2017 Premiu
OK, maybe there's a 100Mb switch somewhere in that chain that's crippling performance. Should be straightforward for them to move one of the printers to a different vlan to see if that changes performance.