Sage 100

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

  • 1.  Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 10:43

    Has anyone modified the direct deposit stub in payroll 2.0 so that it replicates a check, stub, stub format? I thought it would be as simple as copying the check form, renaming the file, and forcing the check type = 3 (check, stub, stub) but that didn't work.



    ------------------------------
    Joe Uhl
    Eide Bailly, Inc.
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 10:46
    I tried and gave up.  Told client it wasn't supported.  Interested if anyone got it to work.  

    Get Outlook for iOSo
     


    ------Original Message------

    Has anyone modified the direct deposit stub in payroll 2.0 so that it replicates a check, stub, stub format? I thought it would be as simple as copying the check form, renaming the file, and forcing the check type = 3 (check, stub, stub) but that didn't work.



    ------------------------------
    Joe Uhl
    Eide Bailly, Inc.
    ------------------------------


  • 3.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 11:25
    Edited by Jeff Schwenk 04-26-2019 11:33
    One would think that more than two people have encountered this situation by now and there would be a PU issued.  Or perhaps since Sage is so slow to fix things that no one reports them.  This happened to me this week with the Manual Check VI import not assigning the next wire number.  An obvious bug that @Jim Woodhead came to the rescue on with a perform logic script.  Who will be the pioneer to report this bug?​


  • 4.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 11:55
      |   view attached
    Are you saying you cannot generate a check stub stub when selecting that format?  PR_Check2.rpt.  The layout is confusing compared to previous versions of crystal but stubs can be edited.  I attached an example.

    ------------------------------
    alan niergarth
    Velosio LLC
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 13:05
    @alan niergarth ​Yes, that is the format we want to recreate but for Direct Deposit Stubs as well. Basically, the client wants the Direct Deposit Stub to replicate the Check form (Check-Stub-Stub). Check form is not a problem.

    ------------------------------
    Joe Uhl
    Eide Bailly, Inc.
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 6.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 14:35
    Edited by Rhonda McNamara 04-27-2019 09:55

    The stubs (PR_DirectDepositStub.rpt) use the same table, but check form pulls off of sub reports to make the stubs.  The stub form doesn't have that sub report.  But perhaps you could add that.  Also, section suppression, and parameters that came from the dialog box for checks would be different.  So you probably have to start with the stub.    WHOOPS, I was thinking of AP checks.

     

    Rhonda McNamara

    Stewart Technologies, Inc.

    410-309-9550 x-108

     



    ------Original Message------

    @alan niergarth ​Yes, that is the format we want to recreate but for Direct Deposit Stubs as well. Basically, the client wants the Direct Deposit Stub to replicate the Check form (Check-Stub-Stub). Check form is not a problem.

    ------------------------------
    Joe Uhl
    Eide Bailly, Inc.
    ------------------------------


  • 7.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 14:38

    I would like to state that I am not a fan of the new Payroll check layout.  Seems like we have a lot less control and not intuitive..

     

     

    Jim

     



    ------Original Message------

    The stubs (PR_DirectDepositStub.rpt) use the same table, but check form pulls off of sub reports to make the stubs.  The stub form doesn't have that sub report.  But perhaps you could add that.  Also, section suppression, and parameters that came from the dialog box for checks would be different.  So you probably have to start with the stub.

     

    Rhonda McNamara

    Stewart Technologies, Inc.

    410-309-9550 x-108

     





  • 8.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 14:47
    I'm also not a fan of the new check layout.  Many of our clients use blank check stock with the large stub on top and although I've just started experimenting with it, I'm not seeing a way to get it to work.  The standard form is designed for large stub on bottom.

    ------------------------------
    Barbara Goldstein
    Sr. Consultant
    DSD Business Systems
    San Jose CA
    800.627.9032 x221
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 9.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-26-2019 16:54
    Edited by alan niergarth 04-26-2019 16:54
    agree with all of the above about difficulty with manipulating format of new check.  @Joe Uhl have to admit I haven't tried adding new stub to direct deposit layout. ​I needed to read your comment more carefully!

    ------------------------------
    alan niergarth
    Velosio LLC
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 10.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-27-2019 09:55
    I think I see it - the magic that makes it print the check face.  The same sections get 3 passes during printing and it conditionally supresses the check part if it's on a "stub pass."
    Here's the section suppression and the groups that give you the 3 passes.  And it's hard to mess with groups on the forms and reports that come from a dialog box with sort orders, etc. 



    ------------------------------
    ==================
    Rhonda McNamara
    Customer Success Manager
    Stewart Technologies, Inc.
    rsm@stewarttechnologies.com
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-29-2019 10:51
    @Rhonda McNamara I saw that as well, so I hard-coded​ CheckFormType formula to "3" but still bad results. I may need to create a new formula field and hard-code it to "3"​ and change references in Section Expert to new formula. Sage might be programatically changing CheckFormType.​ Thanks.

    ------------------------------
    Joe Uhl
    Eide Bailly, Inc.
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 12.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 04-29-2019 14:56
    How about a subreport of what's in the main part. located in some header or footer row?  I know there's a way.  I almost did it Saturday out of curiosity.

    ------------------------------
    ==================
    Rhonda McNamara
    Customer Success Manager
    Stewart Technologies, Inc.
    rsm@stewarttechnologies.com
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 13.  RE: Payroll 2.0 Direct Deposit Stub - check-stub-stub

    Posted 09-03-2019 17:41
    Somewhat similar to this thread, I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to maintain separate Payroll check stubs with the new Payroll (link).

    ------------------------------
    - Brett
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


Related Content