Cloud Computing as defined on the Microsoft Azure website:
""Simply put, cloud computing is the delivery of computing servicesservers, storage, databases, networking, software, analytics, intelligence and moreover the Internet (""the cloud"") to offer faster innovation, flexible resources, and economies of scale. You typically pay only for cloud services you use, helping lower your operating costs, run your infrastructure more efficiently, and scale as your business needs change.""
If you host Sage 100/300/500 with a service such as I-Business Network, are these no longer On Premise solutions? The problem is that there are different flavors or variations of the cloud computing definition. Sage thought they could gain more sales by simply putting cloud in the names. When they were challenged on this, then they came up with the ""cloud connected services"" explanation - a lame explanation at best.
Sage didn't go far enough. If they wanted to ""pretend"" the legacy products could be cloud products, then they should have enlisted I-BN and other private cloud services, as well as AWS and Azure implementations, and set those up as the standard deployment. Then, as with one of their competitors, they make it clear that customers also have the flexibility to run the software On Premise. This has been a failed marketing effort from Sage, primarily because it's a revolving door for top management resulting in no real commitment or ownership.