MOTM Sage Presentations
I expect the Sage Live and Payroll presentations will be valuable and informing without much controversy. The Road Ahead and Town Hall, however, have the potential for some negative comments and responses. I, for one, would hope we and the attendees would limit this to constructive comments and discussions. Sage is well aware of the past meetings all the way up into the executive ranks, so they know we have issues and are outspoken on many topics. The people who are presenting at MOTM are essentially the ""messengers"", so they are not the decision makers, nor do they have much influence in my opinion. I do believe, however, that if we can present positive concerns and recommendations to these people, they will be more inclined to communicate this to the top. This also would include any off-line conversations. For the most part, this is how the BPAC has worked, and we have made some progress over the past 2 years. There have been criticisms from the large resellers, but people like Steve Blythe are very careful about how they express this, because their business is still very dependent on Sage.
I don't know if or how we communicate this to the attendees or if any of you agree with me. If we do this during the introduction (as in ""ground rules"") or carefully moderate the sessions, that would work also. I suggest that the way we approach Sage during this conference also helps us in the implementation of our new strategic objectives related to Sage. In addition to your comments here, perhaps we can also give this some time at the Board meeting next week.