Sage News and Discussion

 View Only
  • 1.  Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 C

    Posted 12-28-2016 10:20
      |   view attached
    Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 CRE (aka Timberline)

    Attachment(s)



  • 2.  RE: Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 C

    Posted 12-28-2016 10:42
    I understand that the initial releases of web-enabled access are for the mobile applications, but it is implied this is going to be done for other functions as well. I personally don't care if an ERP (such as Sage 100) is web-enabled, but competitively this becomes necessary, and for 300 CRE this must be the case. So why doesn't Sage have a similar initiative for Sage 100 ERP? They would have to do it quickly, because this 12, 18, 24 month stuff doesn't work. They end up being behind again upon release and the market has moved on. I personally think the roadmap for Sage 100 contains projects that are seemingly to keep us and the users happy and on the product. To better deploy resources and dollars, I would have scrapped the Payroll and made all users go to Sage Payroll Services at a similar price as the current subscription for current users. That way they build a strong base of users and there is one solution for all products. As for Work Order, Job Cost and related modules going to framework, why bother? They aren't going to necessarily add or improve those products significantly, so we are stuck with the same basic functions. I know this is a controversial subject, but they could rework some of JobOps (Sage Manufacturing) to come up with something that did much more and probably get better value for their dollars. And while they are at it, just buy JobOps so we don't have to put up with the frugal, resource poor organization that is presenting us with delay after delay in their development efforts. And, yes, I'd like to see a web-enabled Sage 100, so that is not a factor when selling. But it has to be in a very short time - under a year. I'm sure there are plenty of young, talented programmers in India who need the work.


  • 3.  RE: Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 C

    Posted 12-28-2016 11:16
    WAG: I think 100c was supposed to be their web enabled update (hence the c in the name) but technically Sage couldn't pull it off. This is a complete guess but the fact that UK continues to call Sage 100c - ""Sage 100 Cloud"" seems to be a clue.


  • 4.  RE: Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 C

    Posted 12-28-2016 11:26
    @GaryFeldman can make any application a cloud application. You're using your browser, on the Internet, on my remote servers, and voila, there's your cloud app! (And forget the ""c"".)


  • 5.  RE: Looks as if Sage is working on updating Sage 300 C

    Posted 12-28-2016 11:56
    We just went through this with SAP B1. They have a new browser version which is like the old BlyMobile terminal emulator. We found that the Citrix Web Client is more functional and secure and are sticking with that until the browser client is a true browser client. IMHO the true browser client applications like NetSuite, IntAcct and SalesForce have come a long way to match the functionality of rich clients, but the user experience is still more limited in what they can do. The CLOUDY world we live in seems to have a good enough attitude and will likely become the standard until the pendulum swings back to an application based world as it has in Mobile Apps. My experience with both Sage Mobile and SAP mobile based apps has been that the Apple or Android native applications have been easier to use and typically more functional than the browser mobile apps that require 100% online access. I can play Candy Crush offline, but not Game of War or Mobile Strike. I like the option of being in low bandwidth areas and not suffering completely. However, I must admit the latest connected version of B1 mobile with their new UI is much better than the old one and I could be proven wrong.