General Consultant Discussion

 View Only
  • 1.  It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:17
    It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on each profile AND it wants each user to be administrator. We had to go to C:\Program Files (x86)\Sage Payment Solutions\Application Deployment\Applications\26A46608D5AA4BF6BA5D5EEA1376D09A\2.0.2.16 and find the SageExchange.exe go to the properties of all users and indicate to run as administrator. Then set a shortcut to the desktop. The users must manually start Sage Exchange (until we determine the registry or location of the file on the terminal server).


  • 2.  RE: It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:21
    Cool. Wasn't one of the updates included in SED 2.0 compatibility with remote desktops? I'm sure this will get better now that Sage has expunged SPS /s


  • 3.  RE: It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:23
    Maybe compatibility means not installing.


  • 4.  RE: It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:23
    BTW, I usually DL SED 2.0 from the web and run it manually as administrator. I have 0.0 apps from Sage that I trust to run without admin privileges. If I can't right click, run-as-administrator then I go get the IT person and have them provide credentials.


  • 5.  RE: It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:26
    Well, the problem is after logging in as administrator and installing this user still cannot access without us setting SageExchange.exe to run as administrator for all users and then adding a shortcut to that file to the startup directory of all users c:\program data\microsoft\windows\start menu\startup. AND ignore the new message that says SED 2.0 can't install without administrative privileges that now pops up every time they login.


  • 6.  RE: It appears Sage Exchange 2.0 requires install on e

    Posted 07-12-2017 08:36
    Ah, this is obviously some strange use of the word compatible that I wasn't previously aware of.