My suggestion is aim high and at the big picture.
Start with suggesting a long term roadmap and the group act as a common driving force in keeping this on track ( to the best of our ability given Sage’s structure ).
Yes, this should be what product advisory does. Suggest advisory council should be retooled.
1. Create a type of customer bill of rights. What can a Sage 100 customer expect no matter who the product marketing or product manager is?
2. Long term development - the Sage customer of 1990 is vastly different than 2021. What needs to happen to the product for it to be a better fit for a 10-20 user site? Can we get rid of workstation setup? Reduce access to the full MAS90 folder, etc
3. How can we best identify the customer who can benefit from a move to Intacct. I think there are probably three or four traits ( heavy GL user, not a user of enhancements, stringent IT where loading a service or local client is difficult due to rights issues ). Help move these customers where the fit is there.
In my opinion avoid approaching Sage lobbying any type of narrow technical issue. Keep it broad and guiding. Think longer term. Think customer benefit. Think about helping create a plan that ensures the product keeps moving forward even when staff rotate in and out of marketing and product management.
Sage benefits in two ways
A - Recurring customers
B - Carrying the message to existing customers about Intacct
I don’t think you should get too bogged down in arguing details. Be more concerned about long term with an eye toward benefits A and B.
---------------------------------
Wayne Schulz - Schulz Consulting - 860-516-8990
---------------------------------