Wayne - thank you for taking the time to articulate this so clearly. This is an excellent example of where our community is genuinely ahead of the curve, not by competing with AI, but by using it appropriately and intentionally.
What really resonates here is the distinction you're making between AI as a summarization and organization tool versus AI as a content creator. The value in this example comes from current, practitioner-led insight-the kind of real-time, experience-based discussion that simply doesn't exist in public datasets and can't be replicated without trusted community participation.
I also appreciate your note about participation dynamics. You're absolutely right: many members are far more comfortable contributing quietly and thoughtfully within organic forum discussions than committing to more formal collaboration structures. That's an important signal for us as we think about how to surface and preserve high-value content without adding friction.
I'd like to add this approach to the agenda for our next Content Library Steering Committee meeting so we can explore:
- How we identify and elevate these high-signal discussion threads
- Light, consistent standards for summarization and reuse
- Where these short-form summaries could live and how members might best access or share them
No action required now-just flagging this as a promising direction that aligns well with our mission and the evolving realities of AI.
Thanks again for starting this conversation and for modeling exactly the kind of contribution that makes this community so valuable.
------------------------------
Anne Sawyer
90 Minds Inc.
Executive Director
anne.sawyer@90minds.comCA
https://90minds.com------------------------------