Sage 100

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

Jeff Schwenk

Jeff Schwenk10-28-2013 09:09

Jeff Schwenk

Jeff Schwenk10-28-2013 10:10

Doug Higgs

Doug Higgs10-28-2013 10:48

Jeff Schwenk

Jeff Schwenk10-28-2013 14:37

  • 1.  Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 07:49
    Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off? One customer has had it disappear and reset the next batch number to 00001 twice now. There is no record in the Activity log. Version 4.50.5 Advanced.


  • 2.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 08:05
    I have not seen this, but I'm wondering if SY0CTL.SOA might have corrupted records? I've experienced other issues when making changes to legacy modules in setup options and they stick for a while and then at some point the are set back. If I remember correctly there is a record ins SY0CTL.SOA that should mirror the settings in WO0xxx (work order options file) and the SY0 record may write back over the WO0 record.


  • 3.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 08:09
    That's what I'm thinking too. Thanks @DavidOverholt !


  • 4.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:09
    Can you rebuild the sy0ctl file?


  • 5.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:15
    Hmm, would I want to?? I suppose I could copy it first.


  • 6.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:45
    The copy function is your BEST friend.... If it is corrupted, this ""might"" fix it. Maybe Alnoor will give a thumbs up or down on this move.


  • 7.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:53
    It's @AlnoorCassim's birthday today. Give the man a break!


  • 8.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 10:10
    Oops, that's right........


  • 9.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 10:34
    Per a previous @AlnoorCassim post on a similar issue: ""About the Next SO and Invc # , you might want to look at all the xx0 Options tables (except S/O) with DFDM to see if any of them erroneously have [S/OABCx] keys.


  • 10.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 10:37
    You mean it might be looking at another company @DougHiggs?


  • 11.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 10:48
    Yes. That's what it could be doing.


  • 12.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 14:04
    @DougHiggs - Can you post the link to Alnoor's thread? @ThereseLogeais - What was the resolution?


  • 13.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 14:11
    Well, nothing yet except that I reselected it in WO Options @JeffSchwenk.


  • 14.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 14:32
    @JeffSchwenk https://90minds-com.socialcast.com/messages/17947999


  • 15.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 10-28-2013 14:37
    Thanks


  • 16.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 11-04-2013 13:34
    This happened again to this customer but I'm a little confused as to @AlnoorCassim's post. If some other company's setup options are being copied to SY0CTL, why and how do you correct/stop it from reoccurring??


  • 17.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 11-04-2013 15:55
    I believe he means to look in SY0CTL for any B/Cxxx records where xxx is the company having the issue.


  • 18.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 11-05-2013 10:10
    Are there any backup copies of the sy0ctl file - maybe it's reading a wrong file ?


  • 19.  RE: Has anyone else had WO batch entry turn itself off

    Posted 11-05-2013 11:06
    Hmm, good thought @DianaLaughner. I will have to check.