I guess we knew that this was coming so now it is time to figure out our approach.
If we look at other variations that might happen:
a. Would we allow a marketing company - ERP VAR, Juice , for example - to join and showcase all their customers under a single membership?
Me: No
b. What about a company like Sage which has multiple product lines - Sage 100, 300, 500 and wants to join and perhaps market each line individually?
Me: Yes, so long as it's all one company
It seems like the core of our question is - do we allow marketing collaborations as opposed to legal entities? And how do we get around the question of whether it's an entity or a collaboration?
Me: Collaborations are fine as sponsors, provided all the parties to the collaboration are members
I feel as if our pricing for affiliates is designed around the single company / single product. If we had to design pricing for marketing collaboratives, pricing would be higher since multiple members could join together to save money on fees and make joint presentations.
In substance, I believe One is really a collaboration of different entities, as evidenced by their continued marketing of the products separately. As such my feeling is that each entity in One pays separately for membership. If they want to split a sponsorship I have no problem - let all three of them squeeze into a 25 or 55 minute presentation.