90p Admin

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

  • 1.  For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 11:43
    For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 members. It will be interesting to see how many we have renew.


  • 2.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 11:44
    @JeffSchwenk Do we want to prompt Blytheco to let us know if they need to make any changes. Jeffrey Chamoff isn't with Bly any more according to his LinkedIn Page.


  • 3.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 12:07
    157 ... wow .. brilliant!


  • 4.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 12:27
    Oh, they are pretty good at letting us know. Let it ride unless you want to kick him out, then we should let them know that his membership is being suspended....


  • 5.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 12:38
    @RobertWood - Just sent Sally a note for clarification.


  • 6.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 12:49
    That's fine. I wasn't too worried either way.


  • 7.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 15:04
    Sorry! That was my mistake.


  • 8.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-04-2014 15:28
    About Jeffrey Chamoff I mean.


  • 9.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 05:53
    @RobertWood @JeffSchwenk - do we have an easy way to sort members by the responsible payer -- ie can we show all under the Blytheco or John Hoyt?


  • 10.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 05:55
    I have all of them under company name. Is that what you're looking for?


  • 11.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 05:59
    Yes just to see if we have the ability to send companies who pay for multiple people a list of who those people are.


  • 12.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 07:37
    I have it in Excel today. I haven't but can convert it to a Google Spreadsheet. That same info is in MailChimp as of yesterday.


  • 13.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 10:10
    I have the information in MAS by user name and Company. I use this list as the basis for annual billing. I do compare it against a recent SC user list that I can pull from SC.,


  • 14.  RE: For those playing along at home, we're up to 157 m

    Posted 06-05-2014 18:53
    It's actually 159 members. My pivot table wasn't picking up the whole range. I uploaded the list to Google Drive: https://docs.google.com/a/ddfcgi.com/spreadsheets/d/11a7cyZZj0yI0jtAcVJQhYTtXtYNKfZpvIa_PwyVjfFs/edit?usp=sharing


Related Content