Sage 100

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

Wayne Schulz

Wayne Schulz02-25-2014 12:33

Therese Logeais

Therese Logeais02-25-2014 12:35

  • 1.  Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:19
    Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS 200 4.50.4 @Sage100Routine Where in S/O Options or elsewhere do you go to to prevent a special item from being created in SO Entry? It's a pretty cool feature and has its purposes but in this case we need to prevent it. That is an EDI import had some bad item numbers with a * in front and the order gets created in MAS because special items aren't validated.


  • 2.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:31
      |   view attached
    SO, Setup, Misc Item maintenance See attached. Uncheck the box ""allow in sales order.


  • 3.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:33
    Will that stop an on the fly though?


  • 4.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:34
    I was thinking it was probably a security - maybe Role Maintenance - Common Info? Take away the right to create misc items?


  • 5.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:34
    Are you talking about on-the-fly misc. item maintenance? I can't find an option except in role maintenance, perhaps?


  • 6.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:35
      |   view attached
    How about this?


  • 7.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:42
    He's talking about the *Items. I think that is for creating inventory and misc items on the fly.


  • 8.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:43
    Just tested the * items. Couldn't stop with security on misc items. Ignore my comment on misc items. I misunderstood your post.


  • 9.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:44
    Good thought @ThereseLogeais but I think that doesn't prevent the * special items from being entered.


  • 10.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:47
    I know what you're saying, Alnoor. It seems like there was a place, but I can't find it either.


  • 11.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:48
    You could remove the GL accounts for special items in SO Options. This would cause the items to fail


  • 12.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:54
    That works until the user entered a GL account in data entry. Those are defaults.


  • 13.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:56
    Can you put Perform logic in the records section of the VI job to excludes special (*) items?


  • 14.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 12:56
    Well the client just informed me he wants me to write a script to remove the * in front of the item number if it exists <sigh>. The whole problem started cuz of 1 Costco employee miskeying and it just had to be a *


  • 15.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 13:03
    I could definitely do that Doug if it was a V/I job but this is a Mapadoc EDI import so no. Will have to capture it with script (pre-validate on ItemCode) during order creation


  • 16.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 13:13
    As far as I know, there are no controls re: special items. The on-the-fly in role maintenance I believe only impacts inventory items (but with all the changes, that certainly could have changed).


  • 17.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 13:15
    SInce *special items are ALL on the fly, I don't think that is an option. I was just reaching.


  • 18.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-25-2014 13:19
    Your reach is appreciated @ThereseLogeais . And thank you everyone who replied - much appreciated!


  • 19.  RE: Dumb question. I used to know the answer. For MAS

    Posted 02-26-2014 11:09
    I use the Table Set Default values event to trap new codes while they are still cancelable - then substitute the desired code. I use this to create sequential numeric ItemCodes for I/M by having the user enter an 'N' (for Next) as the ItemCode.