Are the inmates running the asylum?
Here's what just triggered me (
Sage KB 117414 )
How does this KB not refer to the version and pu to which the issue was reported? I acknowledge that Sage might not know EVERY version/PU to which this applies bu
t they most certainly know the Version and PU that this was initially reported on. Why not include this in the KB?
Business reason that including the version/PU makes sense:
- Allows VARS to proactively contact customers
- Allows customer to self-service using the Sage KB to determine whether they need to keep an eye on this issue
And this lack of noting the reported version isn't limited to just one or two Sage KB articles. It's a problem across nearly the entire KB.
Period End Processing in GL does not stop you when General Journal Entry or Transaction Journal Entry have existing entries in process. Allows posting to closed period.
Created on 10-28-2022 / Last modified on 11-09-2022
<kanisa_authored_doc>
Summary
<content>
General Journal Entry posts to closed period if created but not posted prior to running Period End Processing.
Period End Processing in GL does not stop you when General Journal Entry or Transaction Journal Entry have existing entries in process like it does for DTR or other modules.
</content>
Cause
<content>
Sage Engineering is currently reviewing.
</content>
Resolution
<content>
Sage Engineering is currently reviewing.
</content>
</kanisa_authored_doc>
------------------------------
Wayne Schulz
wayne@s-consult.comSchulz Consulting
(860) 516-8990
Moodus, CT
------------------------------