We've narrowed it down to Job Billing entries that have a /M instead of using a cost code. It's not all entries with a /M though.
Unfortunately, job history doesn't retain the GL account number. We've asked the user doing billing to start noting which GL account she's entering.
I ran a test using the AR account in the /M line and it didn't cause any issues so I don't think that is the culprit.
What we're seeing is that, occasionally, when there is a /M line in job billing entry, the job transaction report doesn't tie into the corresponding daily transaction register.
Also, we talked with Sage support. Their response was "hmmmm, it shouldn't be doing that".
------------------------------
John Shaver
Chief Value Officer
Axiology
Knoxville TN
(865) 389-3600
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-17-2020 13:02
From: Doug Higgs
Subject: AR Trial Balance Not Tying to GL
If you know the day it didn't tie out you could start digging into the journals that posted on that day. For example, if you print the GL detail report in compressed format (so you can see the ending balance for each day) for the AR account and it ties out to the AR detail on 11/15, but on 11/16 the GL detail doesn't tie then you know something happen on 11/16. Get the journals from 11/16 and start looking through the specific transactions.
------------------------------
Doug Higgs
Midwest Commerce Solutions, Inc
(312) 315-0960
Assistant to the Traveling Secretary
------------------------------