But wait, @JimWoodhead , you don't have my input!
My experience with Active Planner was before there was a sufficient integration with MAS 90. I sold it to a client and Gary claimed it could be integrated, but it was too difficult to deal with, so we dropped it. I also sold it to another client that had no Sage products, but had a custom AS/400 system. We were not necessarily trying to integrate data from that system, but the process of creating budgets was extremely tedious, so again that project failed. All we wanted to do in both cases was to import data from Excel, but there was no easy method of doing that.
I'm not sure if any of this has improved, but the experiences were so bad that I want nothing to do with it. To this day at Summit, I walk a long way around where Active Planner is just to avoid seeing Gary. If you know me, you know that's not me.
In looking at the document Jerry attached, this is from 2008 and is probably one of the same documents we had. They really want to sell their professional services group, but they are very expensive. Prior to them being involved (and our attempted implementations), I sent one of my best consultants (ex-Sage support person) to a class for 3 days on the east coast, thinking she would be prepared to implement after that. No, I was told there was a separate implementation class, so we would need this ""mentored"" implementation process. After a half day of that and reviewing the (lack of) progress with my consultant, I cut it off, because there was no light at the end of the tunnel.
This kind of system cannot be that difficult that it requires the involvement of their professional services group. For that reason, if it has not changed, I don't see it as a good solution for the Sage 100 client base. With the cost of the software and consulting, these projects can easily be $20K - $30K. Most of our clients would never consider paying that for a ""budgeting system"".